ome people believe that famous people's support towards international aid
organisations draws attention to the problems, while others think celebrities
make the problems less important. Discuss both these views and give your own
Sample Answer [263 words]
There is no doubt that celebrities tend to have a large pull on society and the ability to infuence large
numbers of people to change their behaviour. Nevertheless, certain famous individuals might ruin the
concept of charity and giving as they may only be participating in these activities for their own benefit.
When a big name is attached to an international aid or a charitable organisation, it tends to put it on
the map, meaning that it would catch the eye of millions of people. In this way, there is a greater
opportunity for citiens from all cormners of the world to become aware with these issues as well as
donate their time, efforts or hard-earned capital to these causes.
On the contrary, through the endorsement of a celebrity, individuals may view aid organisations as
desperate and only willing to use celebrities to further their cause. Moreover, in the event of a scandal
or a deterioration of a celebrity's reputation, the organisations' good name might go down with the ship
alongside the fall from grace of the famous individual, which would certainly harm them.
From my perspective, if celebrities are genuinely interested in becoming spokespeople for certain
causes or representing a variety of issues, they have the freedom and right to do so. Nevertheless, I
strongly believe they ought to be donating their time and energy from the goodness of their hearts
rather than for seeking fame and fortune, signifying they should not be paid for their efforts. Only in
this way would their efforts be truly considered to be altruistic and genuine.